Mobile AR: Who’s using it? When? and How?

 

Executive Summary

How do consumers feel about mobile AR? Who’s using it? How often? And what do they want to see next? Perhaps more important, what are non-users’ reasons for disinterest? And how can app developers and anyone else building mobile AR apps optimize product strategies accordingly?

These are the questions we set out to answer. Working closely with Thrive Analytics, ARtillery Intelligence wrote questions to be presented to more than 43,000 U.S. adults through Thrive’s established consumer survey engine. The results are in and we’ve analyzed the takeaways in a narrative report.

This follows several months of ARtillery Intelligence Briefings that examine various segments of, and developing use cases for, consumer AR. Now a deeper view into real consumer usage and attitudes validates those narratives while providing new dimension on mobile AR strategies and opportunities.

So what did we find out? At a high level, mobile AR usage has grown to 29 percent of U.S. adults. Many of these users experience AR through dedicated AR apps, such as those built on Apple’s ARkit and Google’s ARCore. But there’s greater engagement with lower-friction experiences such as “AR-as-a-feature.”

Mobile AR users also appear active and engaged, with 59 percent reporting that they use it at least weekly. The top app category is gaming, which we attribute to Pokémon Go’s popularity. But other categories such as social AR and visual search continue to make headway. Mobile AR users also indicated high levels of satisfaction with their experiences.

But beyond these and a few other positive signals, there are negative signs and areas for improvement. For example, non-mobile AR users report low likelihood of adopting, and an explicit lack of interest.

This disparity between current-user satisfaction and non-user disinterest continues to underscore a key challenge for AR: you have to experience it to “get it.” But there’s little drive for non-users to get that first taste. This boils down to a classic “chicken & egg” dilemma that represents a core marketing challenge for AR.

Put another way, AR’s highly visual and immersive format is a double-edged sword. It can create strong affinities and high engagement levels. But the visceral nature of its experience can’t be communicated to prospective users through traditional marketing, such as ad copy or even video.

The same chicken & egg challenge was uncovered in corresponding VR consumer research that we’ll produce in a report like this next month. This makes it a common challenge for immersive tech, though AR is relatively advantaged by mobile ubiquity. Still, it will take time and acclimation before AR reaches a more meaningful share of the population.

Meanwhile, there are strategies to accelerate that process and to build AR apps that align with consumer affinities. In this report, we’ll examine such strategies and unpack the latest survey results. We’ll also examine the ways that Covid-19 impacted this year’s results. As always, the goal is to empower ARtillery Pro subscribers with a greater knowledge position.

 

Subscribe to Access Report

The fastest and most cost-efficient way to get access to this report is by subscribing to ARtillery PRO.

 

Video Companion

 

Methodology

ARtillery Intelligence has partnered with Thrive Analytics by writing the questions for the Virtual Reality Monitor consumer survey. These questions were fielded to more than 43,000 U.S. Adults. ARtillery Intelligence wrote this report, containing its insights and viewpoints on the survey results.

For market sizing and analysis, ARtillery Intelligence follows disciplined best practices, developed and reinforced through its principles’ 15 years in tech sector research and intelligence. This includes the past 5 years covering AR & VR exclusively, as seen in research reports and daily reporting.

Thrive Analytics likewise follows best practices in consumer research, developed over its long tenure as a consumer research firm. More details about the survey sample can be seen in this report’s introduction and more on ARtillery Intelligence research and methodology can be read here.

Disclosure & Ethics Statement

ARtillery Intelligence has no financial stake in the companies mentioned in this report, nor received payment for its production. With respect to market sizing, ARtillery Intelligence remains independent of players and practitioners in the sectors it covers, thus mitigating bias in industry revenue calculations and projections. Disclosure and ethics policy can be seen in full here.

 

Purchase Report
Checkout easily and securely. 

 

 

Questions
Ask us anything

 

 

Reference
Credentials & context